Avenal Power Center, LLC v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AVENAL POWER CENTER, LLC, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civ. Action No. lOcv383 (RJL)
)
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY, et al., )
)
Defundanb. )
ORDER n..--
F or the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered thiS?C day of May, 2011, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [#12] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in partl; and it is further
ORDERED that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [#14] is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the EPA Administrator issue a final agency action, either granting or denying plaintiff s permit application, no later than August 27, 2011.
SO ORDERED.
/f
~ United States District Judge
IThe Court reserves judgment with respect to plaintiffs request for attorney's fees and costs. In addition, in light of the February 4, 2011 declaration by Regina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator of the EPA's Office of Air and Radiation, which was released after plaintiff filed its Motion, as well as subsequent briefs and oral argument, the relief sought by plaintiff has been accordingly revised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Avenal Power Center, LLC v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Avenal Power Center, LLC v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.