Ave Maria University v. Burwell

63 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152735, 2014 WL 5471048
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 2014
DocketCase No. 2:13-cv-630-JSM-CM
StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. Supp. 3d 1363 (Ave Maria University v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ave Maria University v. Burwell, 63 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152735, 2014 WL 5471048 (M.D. Fla. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Ave Maria University’s (“Ave Maria”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 52), Defendants’ Opposition (Dkt. 53), and Plaintiffs Reply (Dkt. 56). Upon consideration of the record, the submissions of the parties, and the relevant law, it is the Court’s conclusion that Ave Maria’s motion for preliminary injunction should be granted.

BACKGROUND

Ave Maria seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining the Defendants from enforcing the mandate issued pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4) and implementing guidance and regulations (the “Mandate”) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on the grounds that it violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq. (“RFRA”), and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Defendants do not dispute that Ave Maria is a non-profit Catholic university purposed with “educating] students in the principles and truths of the Catholic faith”. (PI. Br. at 6). One such element of the Catholic faith that Ave Maria holds and professes concerns the sanctity of life. Ave Maria “believes that each human being bears the image and likeness of God, and therefore that any abortion—including through post-conception contraception— ends a human life and is a grave sin.” Id. at 6-7. Ave Maria also believes that sterilization and the use of contraception are morally wrong.

Ave Maria offers healthcare coverage to its employees through its insured employee healthcare plans. Ave Maria’s religious convictions forbid it from providing contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient products in its employee healthcare plans.

In March 2010, Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). 124 Stat. 119 (2010). The ACA requires employers with 50 or more full-time employees to offer “a group health plan or group health insurance coverage” that provides “minimum essential coverage.” 26 U.S.C. § 5000A(f)(2); §§ 4980H(a), (c)(2). The ACA requires that any employer in this. category must “provide coverage for and shall not impose any cost sharing requirements for” certain preventative service categories. 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a). With respect to women, the Mandate requires “such additional preventative care and screenings ... as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration”. Id. The Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”), a component of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), adopted comprehensive guidelines that were formulated by the private Institute of Medicine (“IOM”) to define the additional “preventive care and screenings”. IOM’s guidelines provide that all FDA-approved contraceptives, sterilization [1365]*1365procedures, and related education and counseling are included in the definition of additional preventative care and screenings under the Mandate. A plan or issuer that fails to provide coverage for these preventative services and screenings will incur substantial tax penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. See e.g., 26 U.S.C. § 4980D(b)(l) (taxing organizations that offer group health plans that do not include coverage for preventative care and screenings under the Mandate $100 per day for each affected individual); 26 U.S.C. § 4980H(c)(l) (taxing organizations that do not offer health coverage and have at least one full-time employee that has certified to the employer under section 1411 of the ACA $2000 per employee each year).

Several categories of employers are exempt from the Mandate pursuant to federal regulations created by HRSA. One such exemption exists for “religious employer[s].” 45 C.F.R. § 147.131(a). A religious employer is defined as an organization that operates as a nonprofit entity as referred to in the Internal Revenue Code provisions 26 U.S.C. § 6033(a)(3)(A)(i) and (iii), which includes churches, their integrated auxiliaries, conventions or associations of churches, and the exclusively religious activities of any religious order. 45 C.F.R. § 147.131(a) (cross-referencing 26 U.S.C. § 6033(a)(3)(A)(i) and (iii)). Other exempted employers include those providing “grandfathered health plans”—plans that existed prior to March 23, 2010, and that have not made specified changes after that date—and employers with fewer than 50 employees. See Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2751, 2764, 189 L.Ed.2d 675 (2014) (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 18011(a), (e), and 26 U.S.C. § 498013(c)(2)). Employers with “grandfathered health plans” need not comply with many of the ACA’s requirements, including the Mandate, while employers with fewer than 50 employees are not required to provide health insurance at all. Id. Ave Maria does not qualify for any of these exemptions.

On July 2, 2013, the Department of Labor, HHS and the Treasury (collectively, the “Departments”) published final rules regarding the federal regulations that implement the Mandate: 78 Fed.Reg. 39,870 (July 2, 2013) (the “2013 Final Rules”). The 2013 Final Rules maintain the exemptions for religious employers, employers with “grandfathered health plans”, and employers with less than 50 employees. The 2013 Final Rules also include “accommodations” for eligible organizations. 78 Fed.Reg. at 39,874-78; see also 45 C.F.R. § 147.131(b)-(c).

Pursuant to the 2013 Final Rules, an “eligible organization” is an organization that: (1) opposes providing coverage for some or all of the contraceptive services required by the Mandate and its implementing regulations on account of religious objections; (2) is organized and operates as a nonprofit entity; (3) holds itself out as a religious organization; and (4) self-certifies that it satisfies the first three criteria pursuant to the procedure included therein. See 78 Fed.Reg. at 39,874. Self-certification under the 2013 Final Rules requires eligible organizations to execute and deliver a specific form to their insurers, self-certifying that they are eligible for the accommodation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
134 S. Ct. 2751 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Wheaton College v. Sylvia Burwell
134 S. Ct. 2806 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Burwell v. Korte
134 S. Ct. 2903 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152735, 2014 WL 5471048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ave-maria-university-v-burwell-flmd-2014.