No. 82-88
I N THE SUPREPI COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
AVCO FINANCIAL S E R V I C E S OF B I L L I N G S ONE, I N C . ,
P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t ,
DANIEL L . C H R I S T I A E N S , BEVERLY A. C H R I S T I A E N S , 1,ELVIN R. CEIRISTIAENS , LINDA K. CMRISTIAENS, ROBERT M. RODMAN AND SUSAN A. RODMAN,
D e f e n d a n t s and R e s p o n d e n t s .
Appeal from: D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , I n and f o r t h e C o u n t y of S i l v e r Bow H o n o r a b l e A r n o l d O l s e n , Judge p r e s i d i n g .
C o u n s e l of R e c o r d :
For P l a i n t i f f :
John L e s l i e H a n m e r , B u t t e , M o n t a n a
For D e f e n d a n t s :
M a u r i c e A. Maf f e i , B u t t e , Ilontana
S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : August 19, 1982
Decided-: October 14, 1982
F i l e d OCT&qSZ Mr. J u s t i c e F r e d J . Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n o f t h e Court.
F o l l o w i n g t h e d e f a u l t by D a n i e l and B e v e r l y C h r i s t i a e n s
(~hristiaens) on a l o a n +e AVCO F i n a n c i a l S e r v i c e s ( A V C O ) , 0m f i x
AVCO o b t a i n e d a judgment a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s f o r $ 8 , 5 7 5 . 1 9 .
AVCO b r o u g h t a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n t o d e t e r m i n e i f
t h e judgment c o n s t i t u t e d a l i e n on c e r t a i n S i l v e r Bow County
property. The D i s t r i c t C o u r t o f t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t
f o r S i l v e r Bow County e n t e r e d a judgment f i n d i n g t h e r e was
no e f f e c t i v e l i e n . W e v a c a t e t h a t judgment.
The f o l l o w i n g i s s u e s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d on r e v i e w :
(1) I s a s e c u r e d p a r t y f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o d i s p o s e o f
c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a d e b t i n order t o reduce
t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e
remedy.
(2) I f a j u n i o r encumbrancer p u r c h a s e s a s e n i o r encum-
b r a n c e r ' s i n t e r e s t u n d e r a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e and t h e r e a f t e r
sells t h e p r o p e r t y , does t h i s c o n s t i t u t e a f o r e c l o s u r e under
T i t l e 71, MCA, and i s t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y t h e r e b y p r e c l u d e d
from p u r s u i n g f u r t h e r r e m e d i e s .
AVCO l o a n e d C h r i s t i a e n s a sum of money on J u n e 8 ,
1978. A s s e c u r i t y f o r t h e loan C h r i s t i a e n s executed a
p r o m i s s o r y n o t e and a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t i n f a v o r of AVCO
which g a v e AVCO a l i e n on v a r i o u s h o u s e h o l d goods and on two
o l d e r automobiles. AVCO a l s o r e c e i v e d a s e c o n d t r u s t i n d e n t u r e
l i e n on r e a l p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue i n B u t t e owned by
Christiaens. The f i r s t l i e n was h e l d on t h i s p r o p e r t y by
Nationwide F i n a n c e Company ( N a t i o n w i d e ) . On September 28, 1979, t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO was i n d e f a u l t .
AVCO f i l e d a n a c t i o n a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s and judgment was
e n t e r e d on November 1, 1 9 7 9 , by d e f a u l t a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s
f o r $8,575.19 p l u s c o s t s and i n t e r e s t . The o b l i g a t i o n due Nationwide was a l s o i n d e f a u l t and
Nationwide n o t i c e d f o r e c l o s u r e on i t s t r u s t i n d e n t u r e on t h e
E x c e l s i o r Avenue p r o p e r t y . The s a l e was conducted on November
8 , 1979, and AVCO, t h e second t r u s t i n d e n t u r e l i e n h o l d e r ,
purchased t h e p r o p e r t y a t t h e t r u s t e e ' s s a l e . AVCO h a s
s u b s e q u e n t l y s o l d t h e p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue a t a
loss.
O November 1, 1979, t h e d a t e of e n t r y of judgment n
a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s , t h e y a l s o owned i n t e r e s t s of r e c o r d i n
l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s p l a t 170-B l o c a t e d i n S i l v e r Bow County.
On March 28, 1980, C h r i s t i a e n s s o l d t h e i r t r a c t 170-B l a n d
t o d e f e n d a n t s Rodman f o r $70,000--of which $8,611.19 was
h e l d back by Summit V a l l e y T i t l e Company pending f i n a l
d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f AVCO by way of t h e i r judgment l i e n .
The f i r s t i s s u e i s whether a s e c u r e d p a r t y i s f i r s t
required t o dispose of c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a
d e b t i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e
s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e remedy.
I n o r d e r t o s e c u r e t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO, C h r i s t i a e n s
gave AVCO a l i e n on a 1969 Oldsmobile, a 1972 C h e v r o l e t
p i c k u p , and household goods and f u r n i t u r e . After default
AVCO d i d n o t a t t e m p t t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n of any of the security.
C h r i s t i a e n s t e s t i f i e d t h a t he d r o v e t h e Oldsmobile " u n t i l
t h e f r o n t end b a l l j o i n t s w e r e r e a l bad" and t h a t h e " p a r k e d
t h e c a r and e v e n t u a l l y it was junked o u t . " Christiaens also
t e s t i f i e d t h a t t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n went o u t on t h e C h e v r o l e t
p i c k u p and t h a t he " f i n a l l y s o l d i t f o r p a r t s . " Most of t h e
household goods and f u r n i s h i n g s were l e f t i n t h e house on
E x c e l s i o r Avenue, b u t t h e C h r i s t i a e n s s t i l l had t h e washer
and d r i e r .
Mark Ayers, manager of t h e B u t t e AVCO o f f i c e , t e s t i f i e d
t h a t AVCO does n o t r e p o s s e s s a s e c u r i t y i f they f e e l t h a t
t h e r e was no way t h e y would g e t t h e i r p r i n c i p a l back by doing so.
C h r i s t i a e n s c o n t e n d t h a t AVCO i s f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o t a k e
p o s s e s s i o n of t h e c o l l a t e r a l and f i r s t d i s p o s e o f i t i n a
r e a s o n a b l y commercial manner b e f o r e a t t e m p t i n g t o a c q u i r e
any d e f i c i e n c y and t h a t s i n c e AVCO d i d n o t r e p o s s e s s any o f
t h e c o l l a t e r a l i t s h o u l d b e p r e c l u d e d from a t t e m p t i n g t o
e n f o r c e i t s judgment on t h e s a l e o f t h e t r a c t 170-B l a n d .
S e c t i o n 30-9-504(1), MCA, provides: "A s e c u r e d p a r t y
a f t e r d e f a u l t may s e l l , l e a s e o r o t h e r w i s e d i s p o s e o f any - or
of t h e c o l l a t e r a l i n i t s then c o n d i t i o n . . ." (Emphasis
added.) I n a d d i t i o n , s e c t i o n 30-9-501(1), MCA, provides:
"When a d e b t o r i s i n d e f a u l t u n d e r a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t , a
secured party. . .may r e d u c e h i s c l a i m t o judgment, foreclosure
o r o t h e r w i s e e n f o r c e t h e s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t by any a v a i l a b l e
j u d i c i a l procedure." The Utah Supreme C o u r t , i n c o n s i d e r i n g
t h e same Uniform Commercial Code s e c t i o n a l l o w e d a s e c u r e d
party t o " a t i t s option, ignore t h a t security [personal
p r o p e r t y ] and s a t i s f y i t s judgment from o t h e r p r o p e r t y [ r e a l
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
No. 82-88
I N THE SUPREPI COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
AVCO FINANCIAL S E R V I C E S OF B I L L I N G S ONE, I N C . ,
P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t ,
DANIEL L . C H R I S T I A E N S , BEVERLY A. C H R I S T I A E N S , 1,ELVIN R. CEIRISTIAENS , LINDA K. CMRISTIAENS, ROBERT M. RODMAN AND SUSAN A. RODMAN,
D e f e n d a n t s and R e s p o n d e n t s .
Appeal from: D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , I n and f o r t h e C o u n t y of S i l v e r Bow H o n o r a b l e A r n o l d O l s e n , Judge p r e s i d i n g .
C o u n s e l of R e c o r d :
For P l a i n t i f f :
John L e s l i e H a n m e r , B u t t e , M o n t a n a
For D e f e n d a n t s :
M a u r i c e A. Maf f e i , B u t t e , Ilontana
S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : August 19, 1982
Decided-: October 14, 1982
F i l e d OCT&qSZ Mr. J u s t i c e F r e d J . Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n o f t h e Court.
F o l l o w i n g t h e d e f a u l t by D a n i e l and B e v e r l y C h r i s t i a e n s
(~hristiaens) on a l o a n +e AVCO F i n a n c i a l S e r v i c e s ( A V C O ) , 0m f i x
AVCO o b t a i n e d a judgment a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s f o r $ 8 , 5 7 5 . 1 9 .
AVCO b r o u g h t a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n t o d e t e r m i n e i f
t h e judgment c o n s t i t u t e d a l i e n on c e r t a i n S i l v e r Bow County
property. The D i s t r i c t C o u r t o f t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t
f o r S i l v e r Bow County e n t e r e d a judgment f i n d i n g t h e r e was
no e f f e c t i v e l i e n . W e v a c a t e t h a t judgment.
The f o l l o w i n g i s s u e s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d on r e v i e w :
(1) I s a s e c u r e d p a r t y f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o d i s p o s e o f
c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a d e b t i n order t o reduce
t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e
remedy.
(2) I f a j u n i o r encumbrancer p u r c h a s e s a s e n i o r encum-
b r a n c e r ' s i n t e r e s t u n d e r a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e and t h e r e a f t e r
sells t h e p r o p e r t y , does t h i s c o n s t i t u t e a f o r e c l o s u r e under
T i t l e 71, MCA, and i s t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y t h e r e b y p r e c l u d e d
from p u r s u i n g f u r t h e r r e m e d i e s .
AVCO l o a n e d C h r i s t i a e n s a sum of money on J u n e 8 ,
1978. A s s e c u r i t y f o r t h e loan C h r i s t i a e n s executed a
p r o m i s s o r y n o t e and a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t i n f a v o r of AVCO
which g a v e AVCO a l i e n on v a r i o u s h o u s e h o l d goods and on two
o l d e r automobiles. AVCO a l s o r e c e i v e d a s e c o n d t r u s t i n d e n t u r e
l i e n on r e a l p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue i n B u t t e owned by
Christiaens. The f i r s t l i e n was h e l d on t h i s p r o p e r t y by
Nationwide F i n a n c e Company ( N a t i o n w i d e ) . On September 28, 1979, t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO was i n d e f a u l t .
AVCO f i l e d a n a c t i o n a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s and judgment was
e n t e r e d on November 1, 1 9 7 9 , by d e f a u l t a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s
f o r $8,575.19 p l u s c o s t s and i n t e r e s t . The o b l i g a t i o n due Nationwide was a l s o i n d e f a u l t and
Nationwide n o t i c e d f o r e c l o s u r e on i t s t r u s t i n d e n t u r e on t h e
E x c e l s i o r Avenue p r o p e r t y . The s a l e was conducted on November
8 , 1979, and AVCO, t h e second t r u s t i n d e n t u r e l i e n h o l d e r ,
purchased t h e p r o p e r t y a t t h e t r u s t e e ' s s a l e . AVCO h a s
s u b s e q u e n t l y s o l d t h e p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue a t a
loss.
O November 1, 1979, t h e d a t e of e n t r y of judgment n
a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s , t h e y a l s o owned i n t e r e s t s of r e c o r d i n
l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s p l a t 170-B l o c a t e d i n S i l v e r Bow County.
On March 28, 1980, C h r i s t i a e n s s o l d t h e i r t r a c t 170-B l a n d
t o d e f e n d a n t s Rodman f o r $70,000--of which $8,611.19 was
h e l d back by Summit V a l l e y T i t l e Company pending f i n a l
d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f AVCO by way of t h e i r judgment l i e n .
The f i r s t i s s u e i s whether a s e c u r e d p a r t y i s f i r s t
required t o dispose of c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a
d e b t i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e
s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e remedy.
I n o r d e r t o s e c u r e t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO, C h r i s t i a e n s
gave AVCO a l i e n on a 1969 Oldsmobile, a 1972 C h e v r o l e t
p i c k u p , and household goods and f u r n i t u r e . After default
AVCO d i d n o t a t t e m p t t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n of any of the security.
C h r i s t i a e n s t e s t i f i e d t h a t he d r o v e t h e Oldsmobile " u n t i l
t h e f r o n t end b a l l j o i n t s w e r e r e a l bad" and t h a t h e " p a r k e d
t h e c a r and e v e n t u a l l y it was junked o u t . " Christiaens also
t e s t i f i e d t h a t t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n went o u t on t h e C h e v r o l e t
p i c k u p and t h a t he " f i n a l l y s o l d i t f o r p a r t s . " Most of t h e
household goods and f u r n i s h i n g s were l e f t i n t h e house on
E x c e l s i o r Avenue, b u t t h e C h r i s t i a e n s s t i l l had t h e washer
and d r i e r .
Mark Ayers, manager of t h e B u t t e AVCO o f f i c e , t e s t i f i e d
t h a t AVCO does n o t r e p o s s e s s a s e c u r i t y i f they f e e l t h a t
t h e r e was no way t h e y would g e t t h e i r p r i n c i p a l back by doing so.
C h r i s t i a e n s c o n t e n d t h a t AVCO i s f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o t a k e
p o s s e s s i o n of t h e c o l l a t e r a l and f i r s t d i s p o s e o f i t i n a
r e a s o n a b l y commercial manner b e f o r e a t t e m p t i n g t o a c q u i r e
any d e f i c i e n c y and t h a t s i n c e AVCO d i d n o t r e p o s s e s s any o f
t h e c o l l a t e r a l i t s h o u l d b e p r e c l u d e d from a t t e m p t i n g t o
e n f o r c e i t s judgment on t h e s a l e o f t h e t r a c t 170-B l a n d .
S e c t i o n 30-9-504(1), MCA, provides: "A s e c u r e d p a r t y
a f t e r d e f a u l t may s e l l , l e a s e o r o t h e r w i s e d i s p o s e o f any - or
of t h e c o l l a t e r a l i n i t s then c o n d i t i o n . . ." (Emphasis
added.) I n a d d i t i o n , s e c t i o n 30-9-501(1), MCA, provides:
"When a d e b t o r i s i n d e f a u l t u n d e r a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t , a
secured party. . .may r e d u c e h i s c l a i m t o judgment, foreclosure
o r o t h e r w i s e e n f o r c e t h e s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t by any a v a i l a b l e
j u d i c i a l procedure." The Utah Supreme C o u r t , i n c o n s i d e r i n g
t h e same Uniform Commercial Code s e c t i o n a l l o w e d a s e c u r e d
party t o " a t i t s option, ignore t h a t security [personal
p r o p e r t y ] and s a t i s f y i t s judgment from o t h e r p r o p e r t y [ r e a l
p r o p e r t y ] i n t h e hands o f t h e judgment d e b t o r . " Kennedy v .
Banlc o f Ephraim ( U t a h 1 9 7 9 ) , 594 P . 2d 881, 884.
" [ T l h e c r e d i t o r c a n i g n o r e h i s s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t and
o b t a i n a judgment on t h e u n d e r l y i n g o b l i g a t i o n and p r o c e e d
by e x e c u t i o n and l e v y . " J . White & R . Summers, Uniform
Commercial Code, a t 962-963 (1972). I t may n o t a l w a y s b e
p r a c t i c a l f o r t h e secured p a r t y t o f i r s t t a k e p o s s e s s i o n of
t h e c o l l a t e r a l and a t t e m p t t o s e l l i t i f t h e v a l u e o f t h e
c o l l a t e r a l h a s s o d i m i n i s h e d t h a t t h e p r o c e e d s from r e s a l e
would c l e a r l y b e i n s u f f i c i e n t t o s a t i s f y t h e d e b t . I t may
t h e n b e t o t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y ' s a d v a n t a g e t o p r o c e e d by
judgment and e x e c u t i o n b e c a u s e i n t h a t way he c a n r e a c h
a s s e t s i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e c o l l a t e r a l and c a n e l i m i n a t e t h e
t w o - s t e p p r o c e s s o f f i r s t s e l l i n g t h e c o l l a t e r a l and t h e n suing f o r a deficiency.
W e hold t h a t a secured c r e d i t o r i s n o t required t o
f i r s t t a k e p o s s e s s i o n and d i s p o s e o f c o l l a t e r a l b e f o r e
o b t a i n i n g a judgment a n d e x e c u t i o n upon o t h e r p r o p e r t y owned
by t h e d e b t o r .
The second i s s u e i s i f a j u n i o r encumbrancer p u r c h a s e s a s e n i o r e n c u m b r a n c e r ' s i n t e r e s t u n d e r a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e and
t h e r e a f t e r s e l l s t h e property, does t h i s c o n s t i t u t e a f o r e c l o s u r e
under ~ i t l e 71, MCA, and i s t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y t h e r e b y p r e c l u d e d
A s p a r t o f t h e c o l l a t e r a l , AVCO r e c e i v e d a s e c o n d l i e n
i n t h e form of a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e on p r o p e r t y t h a t C h r i s t i a e n s
owned on E x c e l s i o r Avenue. Nationwide had t h e f i r s t l i e n
a l s o i n t h e form o f a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e . On November 8 , 1 9 7 9 ,
Nationwide f o r e c l o s e d and t h e p r o p e r t y was s o l d by b i d i n
conformance w i t h T i t l e 71, MCA, r e g a r d i n g t r u s t i n d e n t u r e s .
AVCO was t h e s o l e b i d d e r f o r $ 7 , 8 5 6 . 6 1 - - t h e amount d u e on
Nationwide's balance. AVCO t h e n s o l d t h e p r o p e r t y t h r o u g h a
Butte realtor. AVCO r e c e i v e d a g r o s s s a l e p r i c e o f $8,200
and a f t e r p a y i n g t h e t a x e s and s e l l i n g e x p e n s e s , AVCO n e t t e d
a p p r o x i m a t e l y $6,711.
C h r i s t i a e n s contend t h a t when AVCO b o u g h t and s o l d t h e
E x c e l s i o r Avenue p r o p e r t y , AVCO p r o c e e d e d u n d e r T i t l e 71,
MCA, and i s p r e v e n t e d from any f u r t h e r r e c o v e r y b e c a u s e o f a
d e f i c i e n c y u n d e r s e c t i o n 71-1-317, MCA, which p r o v i d e s :
"When a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e e x e c u t e d i n c o n f o r m i t y w i t h t h i s
p a r t i s f o r e c l o s e d by a d v e r t i s e m e n t and s a l e , no o t h e r o r
f u r t h e r a c t i o n , s u i t , o r proceedings s h a l l be t a k e n o r
judgment e n t e r e d f o r any d e f i c i e n c y a g a i n s t t h e g r a n t o r . . I'
The c o n t e n t i o n on t h e p a r t o f C h r i s t i a e n s and t h e h o l d i n g
o f t h e ~ i s t r i c t o u r t s u g g e s t s c o n f u s i o n a s t o t h e p a r t y who C in fact foreclosed. AVCO did not foreclose on the Excelsior Avenue property. Nationwide did foreclose on that property
in accordance with the procedure under Title 71, MCA, the "Small Financing Act." At the sale conducted by Nationwide, AVCO bid on the property in the amount owed to Nationwide and AVCO then received a trustee's deed covering the Excelsior Avenue property. The title which AVCO received by that trustee's deed had no relationship to AVCO's junior trust indenture lien, or to AVCO's judgment lien. Section
71-1-318, MCA, describes the trustee's deed: "(3) The trustee's deed shall operate to convey to the purchaser, without right of redemption, the trustee's title and all right, title, interest, and claim of the grantor and his successors in interest and of all persons claiming by, through, or under them in and to the property sold. . ." The trustee's deed in this case transferred the title
originally held by Nationwide as trustee and including all
right, title and interest of the Christiaens and all those claiming through them in and to the Excelsior Avenue property. Such trustee's deed has the affect of eliminating the AVCO trust indenture lien under its junior trust indenture, and also eliminating the AVCO judgment lien. As a result of the trustee's deed, AVCO became the owner of the Excelsior Avenue property with a right to sell the same in any manner
it chose. Under section 71-1-317, MCA, relied upon by the
Christiaens, Nationwide was prohibited from taking a deficiency judgment. That section in no way applied to AVCO as a purchaser. AVCO therefore had the right to sell the Excelsior Avenue property without regard to section 71-1-317, MCA.
AVCO did suffer a loss of approximately $1,145 when it sold the Excelsior Avenue property, but AVCO is not attempting to recover from Christiaens any part of that loss. AVCO is
only seeking to recover the amount of its judgment entered on November 1, 1979, plus interest. We hold that AVCO is entitled to a declaratory judgment establishing that its judgment of November 1, 1979, constituted a lien upon the land described as plat 170-B, Silver Bow
County. We vacate the judgment of the District Court in favor of the Christiaens, and direct the court to enter a judgment
for AVCO in accordance with this opinion.
We Concur:
%+ ~LdLdl. Chief Justice