Avco v. Christiaens

Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 1982·No. 82-088·Published

Opinion

No. 82-88

I N THE SUPREPI COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AVCO FINANCIAL S E R V I C E S OF B I L L I N G S ONE, I N C . ,

P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t ,

DANIEL L . C H R I S T I A E N S , BEVERLY A. C H R I S T I A E N S , 1,ELVIN R. CEIRISTIAENS , LINDA K. CMRISTIAENS, ROBERT M. RODMAN AND SUSAN A. RODMAN,

D e f e n d a n t s and R e s p o n d e n t s .

Appeal from: D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , I n and f o r t h e C o u n t y of S i l v e r Bow H o n o r a b l e A r n o l d O l s e n , Judge p r e s i d i n g .

C o u n s e l of R e c o r d :

For P l a i n t i f f :

John L e s l i e H a n m e r , B u t t e , M o n t a n a

For D e f e n d a n t s :

M a u r i c e A. Maf f e i , B u t t e , Ilontana

S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : August 19, 1982

Decided-: October 14, 1982

F i l e d OCT&qSZ Mr. J u s t i c e F r e d J . Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n o f t h e Court.

F o l l o w i n g t h e d e f a u l t by D a n i e l and B e v e r l y C h r i s t i a e n s

(~hristiaens) on a l o a n +e AVCO F i n a n c i a l S e r v i c e s ( A V C O ) , 0m f i x

AVCO o b t a i n e d a judgment a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s f o r $ 8 , 5 7 5 . 1 9 .

AVCO b r o u g h t a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n t o d e t e r m i n e i f

t h e judgment c o n s t i t u t e d a l i e n on c e r t a i n S i l v e r Bow County

property. The D i s t r i c t C o u r t o f t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t

f o r S i l v e r Bow County e n t e r e d a judgment f i n d i n g t h e r e was

no e f f e c t i v e l i e n . W e v a c a t e t h a t judgment.

The f o l l o w i n g i s s u e s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d on r e v i e w :

(1) I s a s e c u r e d p a r t y f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o d i s p o s e o f

c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a d e b t i n order t o reduce

t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e

remedy.

(2) I f a j u n i o r encumbrancer p u r c h a s e s a s e n i o r encum-

b r a n c e r ' s i n t e r e s t u n d e r a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e and t h e r e a f t e r

sells t h e p r o p e r t y , does t h i s c o n s t i t u t e a f o r e c l o s u r e under

T i t l e 71, MCA, and i s t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y t h e r e b y p r e c l u d e d

from p u r s u i n g f u r t h e r r e m e d i e s .

AVCO l o a n e d C h r i s t i a e n s a sum of money on J u n e 8 ,

1978. A s s e c u r i t y f o r t h e loan C h r i s t i a e n s executed a

p r o m i s s o r y n o t e and a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t i n f a v o r of AVCO

which g a v e AVCO a l i e n on v a r i o u s h o u s e h o l d goods and on two

o l d e r automobiles. AVCO a l s o r e c e i v e d a s e c o n d t r u s t i n d e n t u r e

l i e n on r e a l p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue i n B u t t e owned by

Christiaens. The f i r s t l i e n was h e l d on t h i s p r o p e r t y by

Nationwide F i n a n c e Company ( N a t i o n w i d e ) . On September 28, 1979, t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO was i n d e f a u l t .

AVCO f i l e d a n a c t i o n a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s and judgment was

e n t e r e d on November 1, 1 9 7 9 , by d e f a u l t a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s

f o r $8,575.19 p l u s c o s t s and i n t e r e s t . The o b l i g a t i o n due Nationwide was a l s o i n d e f a u l t and

Nationwide n o t i c e d f o r e c l o s u r e on i t s t r u s t i n d e n t u r e on t h e

E x c e l s i o r Avenue p r o p e r t y . The s a l e was conducted on November

8 , 1979, and AVCO, t h e second t r u s t i n d e n t u r e l i e n h o l d e r ,

purchased t h e p r o p e r t y a t t h e t r u s t e e ' s s a l e . AVCO h a s

s u b s e q u e n t l y s o l d t h e p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue a t a

loss.

O November 1, 1979, t h e d a t e of e n t r y of judgment n

a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s , t h e y a l s o owned i n t e r e s t s of r e c o r d i n

l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s p l a t 170-B l o c a t e d i n S i l v e r Bow County.

On March 28, 1980, C h r i s t i a e n s s o l d t h e i r t r a c t 170-B l a n d

t o d e f e n d a n t s Rodman f o r $70,000--of which $8,611.19 was

h e l d back by Summit V a l l e y T i t l e Company pending f i n a l

d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f AVCO by way of t h e i r judgment l i e n .

The f i r s t i s s u e i s whether a s e c u r e d p a r t y i s f i r s t

required t o dispose of c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a

d e b t i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e

s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e remedy.

I n o r d e r t o s e c u r e t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO, C h r i s t i a e n s

gave AVCO a l i e n on a 1969 Oldsmobile, a 1972 C h e v r o l e t

p i c k u p , and household goods and f u r n i t u r e . After default

AVCO d i d n o t a t t e m p t t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n of any of the security.

C h r i s t i a e n s t e s t i f i e d t h a t he d r o v e t h e Oldsmobile " u n t i l

t h e f r o n t end b a l l j o i n t s w e r e r e a l bad" and t h a t h e " p a r k e d

t h e c a r and e v e n t u a l l y it was junked o u t . " Christiaens also

t e s t i f i e d t h a t t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n went o u t on t h e C h e v r o l e t

p i c k u p and t h a t he " f i n a l l y s o l d i t f o r p a r t s . " Most of t h e

household goods and f u r n i s h i n g s were l e f t i n t h e house on

E x c e l s i o r Avenue, b u t t h e C h r i s t i a e n s s t i l l had t h e washer

and d r i e r .

Mark Ayers, manager of t h e B u t t e AVCO o f f i c e , t e s t i f i e d

t h a t AVCO does n o t r e p o s s e s s a s e c u r i t y i f they f e e l t h a t

t h e r e was no way t h e y would g e t t h e i r p r i n c i p a l back by doing so.

C h r i s t i a e n s c o n t e n d t h a t AVCO i s f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o t a k e

p o s s e s s i o n of t h e c o l l a t e r a l and f i r s t d i s p o s e o f i t i n a

r e a s o n a b l y commercial manner b e f o r e a t t e m p t i n g t o a c q u i r e

any d e f i c i e n c y and t h a t s i n c e AVCO d i d n o t r e p o s s e s s any o f

t h e c o l l a t e r a l i t s h o u l d b e p r e c l u d e d from a t t e m p t i n g t o

e n f o r c e i t s judgment on t h e s a l e o f t h e t r a c t 170-B l a n d .

S e c t i o n 30-9-504(1), MCA, provides: "A s e c u r e d p a r t y

a f t e r d e f a u l t may s e l l , l e a s e o r o t h e r w i s e d i s p o s e o f any - or

of t h e c o l l a t e r a l i n i t s then c o n d i t i o n . . ." (Emphasis

added.) I n a d d i t i o n , s e c t i o n 30-9-501(1), MCA, provides:

"When a d e b t o r i s i n d e f a u l t u n d e r a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t , a

secured party. . .may r e d u c e h i s c l a i m t o judgment, foreclosure

o r o t h e r w i s e e n f o r c e t h e s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t by any a v a i l a b l e

j u d i c i a l procedure." The Utah Supreme C o u r t , i n c o n s i d e r i n g

t h e same Uniform Commercial Code s e c t i o n a l l o w e d a s e c u r e d

party t o " a t i t s option, ignore t h a t security [personal

p r o p e r t y ] and s a t i s f y i t s judgment from o t h e r p r o p e r t y [ r e a l

p r o p e r t y ] i n t h e hands o f t h e judgment d e b t o r .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avco v. Christiaens, (Mo. 1982).

Avco v. Christiaens (Avco v. Christiaens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.