Avco v. Christiaens

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 14, 1982
Docket82-088
StatusPublished

This text of Avco v. Christiaens (Avco v. Christiaens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avco v. Christiaens, (Mo. 1982).

Opinion

No. 82-88

I N THE SUPREPI COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AVCO FINANCIAL S E R V I C E S OF B I L L I N G S ONE, I N C . ,

P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t ,

DANIEL L . C H R I S T I A E N S , BEVERLY A. C H R I S T I A E N S , 1,ELVIN R. CEIRISTIAENS , LINDA K. CMRISTIAENS, ROBERT M. RODMAN AND SUSAN A. RODMAN,

D e f e n d a n t s and R e s p o n d e n t s .

Appeal from: D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , I n and f o r t h e C o u n t y of S i l v e r Bow H o n o r a b l e A r n o l d O l s e n , Judge p r e s i d i n g .

C o u n s e l of R e c o r d :

For P l a i n t i f f :

John L e s l i e H a n m e r , B u t t e , M o n t a n a

For D e f e n d a n t s :

M a u r i c e A. Maf f e i , B u t t e , Ilontana

S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : August 19, 1982

Decided-: October 14, 1982

F i l e d OCT&qSZ Mr. J u s t i c e F r e d J . Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n o f t h e Court.

F o l l o w i n g t h e d e f a u l t by D a n i e l and B e v e r l y C h r i s t i a e n s

(~hristiaens) on a l o a n +e AVCO F i n a n c i a l S e r v i c e s ( A V C O ) , 0m f i x

AVCO o b t a i n e d a judgment a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s f o r $ 8 , 5 7 5 . 1 9 .

AVCO b r o u g h t a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n t o d e t e r m i n e i f

t h e judgment c o n s t i t u t e d a l i e n on c e r t a i n S i l v e r Bow County

property. The D i s t r i c t C o u r t o f t h e Second J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t

f o r S i l v e r Bow County e n t e r e d a judgment f i n d i n g t h e r e was

no e f f e c t i v e l i e n . W e v a c a t e t h a t judgment.

The f o l l o w i n g i s s u e s w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d on r e v i e w :

(1) I s a s e c u r e d p a r t y f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o d i s p o s e o f

c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a d e b t i n order t o reduce

t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e

remedy.

(2) I f a j u n i o r encumbrancer p u r c h a s e s a s e n i o r encum-

b r a n c e r ' s i n t e r e s t u n d e r a t r u s t i n d e n t u r e and t h e r e a f t e r

sells t h e p r o p e r t y , does t h i s c o n s t i t u t e a f o r e c l o s u r e under

T i t l e 71, MCA, and i s t h e s e c u r e d p a r t y t h e r e b y p r e c l u d e d

from p u r s u i n g f u r t h e r r e m e d i e s .

AVCO l o a n e d C h r i s t i a e n s a sum of money on J u n e 8 ,

1978. A s s e c u r i t y f o r t h e loan C h r i s t i a e n s executed a

p r o m i s s o r y n o t e and a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t i n f a v o r of AVCO

which g a v e AVCO a l i e n on v a r i o u s h o u s e h o l d goods and on two

o l d e r automobiles. AVCO a l s o r e c e i v e d a s e c o n d t r u s t i n d e n t u r e

l i e n on r e a l p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue i n B u t t e owned by

Christiaens. The f i r s t l i e n was h e l d on t h i s p r o p e r t y by

Nationwide F i n a n c e Company ( N a t i o n w i d e ) . On September 28, 1979, t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO was i n d e f a u l t .

AVCO f i l e d a n a c t i o n a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s and judgment was

e n t e r e d on November 1, 1 9 7 9 , by d e f a u l t a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s

f o r $8,575.19 p l u s c o s t s and i n t e r e s t . The o b l i g a t i o n due Nationwide was a l s o i n d e f a u l t and

Nationwide n o t i c e d f o r e c l o s u r e on i t s t r u s t i n d e n t u r e on t h e

E x c e l s i o r Avenue p r o p e r t y . The s a l e was conducted on November

8 , 1979, and AVCO, t h e second t r u s t i n d e n t u r e l i e n h o l d e r ,

purchased t h e p r o p e r t y a t t h e t r u s t e e ' s s a l e . AVCO h a s

s u b s e q u e n t l y s o l d t h e p r o p e r t y on E x c e l s i o r Avenue a t a

loss.

O November 1, 1979, t h e d a t e of e n t r y of judgment n

a g a i n s t C h r i s t i a e n s , t h e y a l s o owned i n t e r e s t s of r e c o r d i n

l a n d d e s c r i b e d a s p l a t 170-B l o c a t e d i n S i l v e r Bow County.

On March 28, 1980, C h r i s t i a e n s s o l d t h e i r t r a c t 170-B l a n d

t o d e f e n d a n t s Rodman f o r $70,000--of which $8,611.19 was

h e l d back by Summit V a l l e y T i t l e Company pending f i n a l

d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f AVCO by way of t h e i r judgment l i e n .

The f i r s t i s s u e i s whether a s e c u r e d p a r t y i s f i r s t

required t o dispose of c o l l a t e r a l given f o r s e c u r i t y of a

d e b t i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e t h e amount o f t h e judgment b e f o r e

s e e k i n g a n a l t e r n a t i v e remedy.

I n o r d e r t o s e c u r e t h e l o a n w i t h AVCO, C h r i s t i a e n s

gave AVCO a l i e n on a 1969 Oldsmobile, a 1972 C h e v r o l e t

p i c k u p , and household goods and f u r n i t u r e . After default

AVCO d i d n o t a t t e m p t t o t a k e p o s s e s s i o n of any of the security.

C h r i s t i a e n s t e s t i f i e d t h a t he d r o v e t h e Oldsmobile " u n t i l

t h e f r o n t end b a l l j o i n t s w e r e r e a l bad" and t h a t h e " p a r k e d

t h e c a r and e v e n t u a l l y it was junked o u t . " Christiaens also

t e s t i f i e d t h a t t h e t r a n s m i s s i o n went o u t on t h e C h e v r o l e t

p i c k u p and t h a t he " f i n a l l y s o l d i t f o r p a r t s . " Most of t h e

household goods and f u r n i s h i n g s were l e f t i n t h e house on

E x c e l s i o r Avenue, b u t t h e C h r i s t i a e n s s t i l l had t h e washer

and d r i e r .

Mark Ayers, manager of t h e B u t t e AVCO o f f i c e , t e s t i f i e d

t h a t AVCO does n o t r e p o s s e s s a s e c u r i t y i f they f e e l t h a t

t h e r e was no way t h e y would g e t t h e i r p r i n c i p a l back by doing so.

C h r i s t i a e n s c o n t e n d t h a t AVCO i s f i r s t r e q u i r e d t o t a k e

p o s s e s s i o n of t h e c o l l a t e r a l and f i r s t d i s p o s e o f i t i n a

r e a s o n a b l y commercial manner b e f o r e a t t e m p t i n g t o a c q u i r e

any d e f i c i e n c y and t h a t s i n c e AVCO d i d n o t r e p o s s e s s any o f

t h e c o l l a t e r a l i t s h o u l d b e p r e c l u d e d from a t t e m p t i n g t o

e n f o r c e i t s judgment on t h e s a l e o f t h e t r a c t 170-B l a n d .

S e c t i o n 30-9-504(1), MCA, provides: "A s e c u r e d p a r t y

a f t e r d e f a u l t may s e l l , l e a s e o r o t h e r w i s e d i s p o s e o f any - or

of t h e c o l l a t e r a l i n i t s then c o n d i t i o n . . ." (Emphasis

added.) I n a d d i t i o n , s e c t i o n 30-9-501(1), MCA, provides:

"When a d e b t o r i s i n d e f a u l t u n d e r a s e c u r i t y a g r e e m e n t , a

secured party. . .may r e d u c e h i s c l a i m t o judgment, foreclosure

o r o t h e r w i s e e n f o r c e t h e s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t by any a v a i l a b l e

j u d i c i a l procedure." The Utah Supreme C o u r t , i n c o n s i d e r i n g

t h e same Uniform Commercial Code s e c t i o n a l l o w e d a s e c u r e d

party t o " a t i t s option, ignore t h a t security [personal

p r o p e r t y ] and s a t i s f y i t s judgment from o t h e r p r o p e r t y [ r e a l

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Avco v. Christiaens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avco-v-christiaens-mont-1982.