Avants v. State

331 S.W.2d 330, 169 Tex. Crim. 19, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2812
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 3, 1960
DocketNo. 31,403
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 331 S.W.2d 330 (Avants v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avants v. State, 331 S.W.2d 330, 169 Tex. Crim. 19, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2812 (Tex. 1960).

Opinion

BELCHER, Judge.

[20]*20The conviction is for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $250.

Proof was offered that Hale County was a dry area.

Inspector Tippit of the Texas Liquor Control Board testified that on April 7, 1959, he saw the appellant in the 500 block of Cedar Street in Hale County, and on cross-examination he testified that on that date on Cedar Street, a few blocks from the court house in Plainview, he purchased from the appellant one pint of whisky for five dollars.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.

Appellant sought to quash the jury panel in this case upon the same grounds as those relied on in Walls v. State, No. 31,329, 168 Tex. Cr. Rep. 619, 331 S. W. 2d 49. The disposition here is controlled by the decision in Walls.

It is insisted that this conviction cannot stand because the state failed to prove that the alleged sale was made in Hale County.

This court will take judicial notice that Plainview is the county seat of Hale County, Texas, and proof that the sale was made in Plainview is sufficient. McClure v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. Rep. 607, 294 S.W. 2d 838; Bell v. State, 166 Tex. Cr. Rep. 340, 313 S.W. 2d 606.

The statement in the charge that the punishment provided for was a period of days or months not exceeding one year instead of not more than one year as provided by statute does not show error. No jail time was assessed as part of the punishment and there is no showing of injury resulting therefrom. Art. 666 C.C.P.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction and no reversible error appearing the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. State
345 S.W.2d 412 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 S.W.2d 330, 169 Tex. Crim. 19, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avants-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.