Avampato (James) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2014·No. 64688·Unpublished

Opinion

juvenile record when making a sentencing determination, see generally Thomas v. State, 88 Nev. 382, 385, 498 P.2d 1314, 1316 (1972). Further, Chapter 62H, read in its entirety, does not limit the use and definition of "juvenile records" in the manner suggested by Avampato and it was not improper for the Division to rely on information provided by the local probation office in its preparation of his PSI. We conclude that the district court did not err by denying the request to strike the juvenile history section of Avampato's PSI and that he is not entitled to relief Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J.

Pickering

-- ra—sL.x_o2-._5261r Parraguirre 1 1[1;4_

J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(Op I047A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avampato (James) v. State, (Neb. 2014).

Avampato (James) v. State (Avampato (James) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
498 P.2d 1314 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1972)