Avalos v. Cedana

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 26, 2024·No. 2:22-cv-00861·Unknown

Opinion

Gregory B. Thomas (SBN 239870) E-mail: gthomas@bwslaw.com Temitayo O. Peters (SBN 309913) E-mail: tpeters@bwslaw.com Kyle Anne Piasecki (SBN 311961) E-mail: kpiasecki@bwslaw.com Jasper L. Hall (SBN 341113) E-mail: jhall@bwslaw.com 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1650 Oakland, California 94612-3520 Tel: 510.273.8780 Fax: 510.839.9104 Attorneys for Defendants MARY CENDANA (erroneously sued as MARY CEDANA), R.N.; SARAI HARDWICK, L.V.N.; MANDEEP KAUR, R.N.; ROBYN MENDOZA; ANDREA LOPEZ; and SGT. IZAGUIRRE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

VANESSA AVALOS, Individually and as Case No. 2:22-cv-00861-TLN-KJN Successor in Interest to THE ESTATE OF ERNESTO ISAIAH AVALOS, DECEASED, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, Judge: Troy L. Nunley v. Trial Date: N/A MARY CEDANA, R.N.; SARAI HARDWICK, L.V.N.; MANDEEP KAUR, R.N.; ROBYN MENDOZA, ANDREA MORRIS, Defendants.

The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following protective order being issued in this matter: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and for which public disclosure is likely to result in particularized harm and violate privacy interests recognized by law. This information may include: a. personnel file records of any peace officer; b. medical records; c. social security numbers and similar sensitive identifying information (unless redacted by order or by agreement of all parties). d. information which is not publicly available and would threaten the security of the jail if not protected 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. The parties agree to meet and confer to meet and confer prior to trial to discuss the use of designation of Protected Material for use during trial. The parties agree to submit any unresolved disputes related to the use of Protected Material during trial to the assigned magistrate judge within one week of the Pretrial Conference. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designatin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avalos v. Cedana, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Avalos v. Cedana (Avalos v. Cedana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.