Ava P. Trahan v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury

832 F.2d 158, 265 U.S. App. D.C. 390

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ava P. Trahan v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury. Read the opinion of the Court — 824 F.2d 96 →

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 26, 1987·No. 86-5051·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

WALD, C.J., and SENTELLE, J., did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellants’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

WALD, C.J., and SENTELLE, J., did not participate in this order.

Ava P. Trahan v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, 832 F.2d 158, 265 U.S. App. D.C. 390 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Pincite

832 F.2d 158 (Ava P. Trahan v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.