Ava Marie Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION AVA MARIE YOUNG CASE NO. 6:24-CV-01606 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID J. AYO
JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, noting the absence of any objection, and having determined that the findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that, consistent with the Report and Recommendation, the Commissioner’s decision should be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).! More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to evaluate claimant’s subjective complaints regarding symptoms of her back pain in order to permit meaningful review. THUS DONE in Chambers on this | S$ day of April, 2026. // Z
SJ GOW J ROBERT R. SUMMERHAY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JYDGE
' A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ava Marie Young v. Commissioner of Social Security (Ava Marie Young v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.