Auxiliary Graphic Equipment, Inc. v. Fortner Graphic Solutions, Inc.

382 S.W.3d 245, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2012 WL 5306363
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2012·No. No. WD 74177·Published

Opinion

[246] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Auxiliary Graphic Equipment, Inc., appeals from a circuit court judgment denying its conversion claim against Harold Fortner, Jr. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Auxiliary Graphic Equipment, Inc. v. Fortner Graphic Solutions, Inc., 382 S.W.3d 245, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370, 2012 WL 5306363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

382 S.W.3d 245 (Auxiliary Graphic Equipment, Inc. v. Fortner Graphic Solutions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.