Autry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Autry v. State

230 S.W.2d 231, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2347

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 24, 1950

DocketNo. 24778

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W.2d 231 (Autry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Autry v. State, 230 S.W.2d 231, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2347 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction of the offense of passing a forged instrument with the intent to injure and defraud. His punishment was assessed at- confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

[232]*232The record is brought forward with no statement of facts and no bills of exception. The proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction of the offense of passing a forged instrument with the intent to injure and defraud. His punishment was assessed at- confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years.

[232]*232The record is brought forward with no statement of facts and no bills of exception. The proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.2d 231, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autry-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.