Autry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Autry v. State

147 S.W. 251, 66 Tex. Crim. 406, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 276

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 1912·No. No. 1767.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and 1 fined $100.

Upon the motion of the State the appeal herein is dismissed because the recognizance is wholly insufficient in that it does not state that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, nor does it state that he was convicted of any offense defined by law, nor does it state the penalty assessed. The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

The appellant was convicted for unlawfully carrying a pistol and 1 fined $100.

Upon the motion of the State the appeal herein is dismissed because the recognizance is wholly insufficient in that it does not state that appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor, nor does it state that he was convicted of any offense defined by law, nor does it state the penalty assessed. The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Autry v. State, 147 S.W. 251, 66 Tex. Crim. 406, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 276 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

147 S.W. 251 (Autry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.