Autrey v. State
152 So. 25, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 11
This text of 152 So. 25 (Autrey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Autrey v. State, 152 So. 25, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 11 (Ala. 1933).
Opinions
After due consideration, the majority of the justices are not of opinion that the statement in the ora! charge of the court, to which the exception was reserved, constitutes reversible error, when the same is considered in connection with the other parts of the charge.
The judgment is therefore by the court ordered affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
American Ry. Express Co. v. Dunnaway & Lambert
92 So. 780 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Hair v. Little
28 Ala. 236 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1856)
Furhman v. Mayor of Huntsville
54 Ala. 263 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Johnson v. State
62 So. 328 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Andrews v. State
48 So. 858 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 So. 25, 228 Ala. 130, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autrey-v-state-ala-1933.