Autrey v. North Bros.

328 S.E.2d 624, 285 S.C. 121, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 375
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 3, 1985
Docket22274
StatusPublished

This text of 328 S.E.2d 624 (Autrey v. North Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Autrey v. North Bros., 328 S.E.2d 624, 285 S.C. 121, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 375 (S.C. 1985).

Opinions

Gregory, Justice:

This consolidated appeal presents the issue of whether the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to approve a third party settlement under S. C. Code Ann. § 42-1-560(f) when the petitioning employees have no present disability compensable under the Occupational Disease Act. The Commission ruled there was not jurisdiction, and the employees appeal. We dismiss.

In a related case before this Court, Talley v. John-Mansfield, et al., 328 S. E. (2d) 621 (1985), we determined that refusal to grant a stay of the third party actions was an abuse of discretion. Since a stay has been ordered, the present dispute is now moot.1

Appeal dismissed.

Harwell, and Chandler, JJ., and Alexander M. Sanders, Jr., Acting Associate Justice, concur. Littlejohn, C. J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Talley v. John-Mansville Sales Corp.
328 S.E.2d 621 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Fisher v. South Carolina Department of Mental Retardation-Coastal Center
291 S.E.2d 200 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 S.E.2d 624, 285 S.C. 121, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autrey-v-north-bros-sc-1985.