Autrey v. North Bros.

328 S.E.2d 624, 285 S.C. 121, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 375
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 3, 1985·No. 22274·Published

Opinions

Gregory, Justice:

This consolidated appeal presents the issue of whether the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction to approve a third party settlement under S. C. Code Ann. § 42-1-560(f) when the petitioning employees have no present disability compensable under the Occupational Disease Act. The Commission ruled there was not jurisdiction, and the employees appeal. We dismiss.

In a related case before this Court, Talley v. John-Mansfield, et al., 328 S. E. (2d) 621 (1985), we determined that refusal to grant a stay of the third party actions was an abuse of discretion. Since a stay has been ordered, the present dispute is now moot.1

Appeal dismissed.

Harwell, and Chandler, JJ., and Alexander M. Sanders, Jr., Acting Associate Justice, concur. Littlejohn, C. J., dissenting.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Autrey v. North Bros., 328 S.E.2d 624, 285 S.C. 121, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 375 (S.C. 1985).

328 S.E.2d 624 (Autrey v. North Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Talley v. John-Mansville Sales Corp.
328 S.E.2d 621 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Fisher v. South Carolina Department of Mental Retardation-Coastal Center
291 S.E.2d 200 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)