Autosound & Security, Inc. v. Kato Building Company, LTD.
This text of Autosound & Security, Inc. v. Kato Building Company, LTD. (Autosound & Security, Inc. v. Kato Building Company, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-20-00140-CV ___________________________
AUTOSOUND & SECURITY, INC., Appellant
V.
KATO BUILDING COMPANY, LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2020-00236-JP
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
We have considered “Appellant's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 20, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Autosound & Security, Inc. v. Kato Building Company, LTD., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autosound-security-inc-v-kato-building-company-ltd-texapp-2020.