Automobile Finance Co. v. Markman
This text of 82 Pa. Super. 478 (Automobile Finance Co. v. Markman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the decree of the court below discharging a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. “It must be a very plain case of error in law, if we sustain appeals in such cases as this, from the decree of the common pleas discharging the rule”: ¿Etna Insurance Co. v. Confer, 158 Pa. 604. The opinion filed by Judge Gordon, of the court below, upon discharging the rule, renders unnecessary further discussion of the question involved.
The appeal is dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff, ■ but without prejudice to his right to a trial by jury, and a second appeal after final judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Pa. Super. 478, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/automobile-finance-co-v-markman-pasuperct-1923.