Automobile Club v. Director of Revenue

748 S.W.2d 178, 1988 Mo. LEXIS 27, 1988 WL 21619
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1988
DocketNo. 69679
StatusPublished

This text of 748 S.W.2d 178 (Automobile Club v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Automobile Club v. Director of Revenue, 748 S.W.2d 178, 1988 Mo. LEXIS 27, 1988 WL 21619 (Mo. 1988).

Opinion

BLACKMAR, Judge.

The appellant supplies travel information and services to its members, in return for annual membership fees. As part of this service, it supplies a monthly magazine, “Midwest Motorist”, without additional cost.

The magazine is printed in Illinois. Appellant furnishes the printer with addressed mailing labels. When printing is complete the printer affixes the labels and then ships the addressed magazines by contract carrier to the bulk mail center maintained by the United States Postal Service in St. Louis County. The postal service then delivers the magazine to the members.

The Administrative Hearing Commission determined that the magazines were subject to the Missouri Use Tax, 144.610, RSMo 1986.

The case is indistinguishable from May Department Stores, Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 748 S.W.2d 174 (Mo. banc 1988), decided today. The taxpayer does not exercise the privilege of “storing, using or consuming” the magazines in Missouri, and so is not subject to Missouri use tax. Section 144.610, RSMo 1986. The circumstance that the magazines are carried into Missouri and travel the Missouri highways before being delivered to the post office is not significant, and this journey does not amount to a taxable use by the taxpayer.

It makes no difference that this result may discriminate against Missouri printers, who would have to collect sales tax, and Illinois printers, who apparently do not. There must still be a taxable incident on which to found the tax. The appellant does not claim a privilege of “storing, using or consuming” the property, and these are the only incidents which trigger the use tax.

The decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission is reversed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

May Department Stores Co. v. Director of Revenue
748 S.W.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
748 S.W.2d 178, 1988 Mo. LEXIS 27, 1988 WL 21619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/automobile-club-v-director-of-revenue-mo-1988.