Automobile Banking Corp. v. Williamsport National Bank
9 A.2d 886, 336 Pa. 298, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 513
Opinion
We adopt the opinion of the court below, which concludes: “Because we believe that this case is not free from doubt, and that there should be a broad inquiry into the facts, the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is discharged ...”
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Automobile Banking Corp. v. Williamsport National Bank, 9 A.2d 886, 336 Pa. 298, 1939 Pa. LEXIS 513 (Pa. 1939).
9 A.2d 886 (Automobile Banking Corp. v. Williamsport National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrison Music Co. v. Colonial Underwriters
7 Pa. D. & C.2d 423 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Saracena v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.
2 Pa. D. & C.2d 356 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1954)
Alexander v. Alexander
65 A.2d 695 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)