Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 479, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2853
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 B.T.A. 674
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 12, 1926·No. Docket No. 4987.·Published

Opinion

Littleton :

This is an appeal from the determination of deficiencies for the years 1918 and 1919 in the amounts of $32,802.85 and $7,800.80, respectively, of which amounts approximately $2,100 is in dispute.

The controversy arises from the reduction by the Commissioner from $50,000 to $25,000 of invested capital, representing alleged value of patents and license agreements.

[480] FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is a Delaware corporation with principal office in New York City. During the taxable years it was affiliated with the Sypho-Chemical Sprinkler Corporation. On February 6, 1916, the Sypho-Chemical Sprinkler Corporation acquired for $200,000 par value of its capital stock certain patents and license agreements covering a certain automatic fire extinguishment system, which patents and license agreements had an actual cash value at the time acquired for stock of $50,000.

Judgment will he entered for the petitioner upon the issue raised on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner, 5 B.T.A. 479, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2853 (bta 1926).

5 B.T.A. 479 (Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of Automatic Sprinkler Co. of America
5 B.T.A. 479 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)