Automatic Recording Safe Co. v. Burns Co.
This text of 224 F. 513 (Automatic Recording Safe Co. v. Burns Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is almost identical with Automatic Recording Safe Company v. Bankers’ Registering Safe Company and White Brass Castings Company, 224 Fed. 506, in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; the only difference being that defendant has not used complainant’s trade-mark “Teller.” A copy of the opinion in that case is attached hereto.
For the reasons stated therein, there should be a decree adjudging validity of all the claims sued on, but all held not infringed, except claim 8 of the Fisher patent, No. 793,779; also decreeing defendant liable for unfair competition, and for an account and injunction, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 F. 513, 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/automatic-recording-safe-co-v-burns-co-nysd-1915.