Automated Transactions, LLC v. Iyg Holding Co.
This text of Automated Transactions, LLC v. Iyg Holding Co. (Automated Transactions, LLC v. Iyg Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
\___/ NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit AUTOMATED TRANSACTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, - V. IYG HOLDING CO., 7-ELEVEN, INC., VCOM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., AND CARDTRONICS USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1492 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the District of De1aware in case no. 06-CV-0043, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ORDER Upon consideration of Automated Transactions, LLC’s motion for an extension of time, until February 3, 2012, to file its reply brief, IT ls ORnER1;D THAT: The motion for an extension of time is granted
\‘~1.J AUTOMATED TRANSACTIONS V. IYG HLDG 2 JAN 31 2012 Date cc: A1bert L. Jacobs, Jr., Esq. Dona1d R. Dunner, Esq. s21 FoR THE CoURT /sf J an I~Iorba1y J an Horbaly Clerk FlLED U.S. CUURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDEHAL C|RCUlT JAN 31 2012 JAN HORBALV CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Automated Transactions, LLC v. Iyg Holding Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/automated-transactions-llc-v-iyg-holding-co-cafc-2012.