Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. Quinn

403 N.E.2d 454, 49 N.Y.2d 792, 426 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2149
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 20, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 403 N.E.2d 454 (Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. Quinn, 403 N.E.2d 454, 49 N.Y.2d 792, 426 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2149 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

[795]*795OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by deleting therefrom the words "and complaint dismissed” and as modified affirmed on the memorandum of the Appellate Division, without costs. What was transferred to Albany Supreme Court by New York County Supreme Court was a motion made in the New York County action, which the court held was more properly the subject of an article 78 proceeding. The underlying action was not transferred and the record does not reveal whether it is still pending in New York County. It was, therefore, error on appeal from the judgment in the Albany County article 78 proceeding to dismiss the complaint in the New York County declaratory judgment action.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

April 1, 1980

Motion to amend remittitur, considered as a motion to amend memorandum, granted to the extent that the first sentence of the memorandum is replaced with the following two sentences: The order of the Appellate Division is modified by deleting therefrom the words "and complaint dismissed” and inserting in lieu thereof the words "without prejudice to plaintiff raising the issues sought to be litigated in the article 78 proceeding in such other litigation as plaintiff may be advised to pursue, including, if it be still pending, the action originally brought in New York County.” As so modified the order is affirmed on the memorandum of the Appellate Division, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlile v. Waite
265 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Finley v. Giacobbe
79 F.3d 1285 (Second Circuit, 1996)
Nassau Chapter Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. County of Nassau
154 Misc. 2d 545 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
City Construction Development, Inc. v. Commissioner of the New York State Office of General Services
176 A.D.2d 1145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Straight v. State University
150 Misc. 2d 1058 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
Yaeger v. Educational Testing Service
158 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. State
125 A.D.2d 55 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Akivis v. Brecher
125 Misc. 2d 582 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. Quinn
90 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 N.E.2d 454, 49 N.Y.2d 792, 426 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/automated-ticket-systems-ltd-v-quinn-ny-1980.