Autogiro Co. of America

Court of Claims

Autogiro Co. of America

184 Ct. Cl. 801, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1968 WL 2146

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 10, 1968

DocketNo. 50328

StatusPublished

This text of 184 Ct. Cl. 801 (Autogiro Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Autogiro Co. of America, 184 Ct. Cl. 801, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1968 WL 2146 (cc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

This case came before the court on plaintiff’s motion for rehearing and reconsideration and to amend and alter the court’s opinion and judgment of October 13,1967,181 Ct. Cl. 55, 384 F. 2d 391. Upon consideration thereof, together with [802]*802tbe response thereto and without oral argument, the court on May 10, 1968, ordered that the motion of plaintiff be denied and the case be remanded to the trial commissioner for proceedings under Eule 47 (c); that the trial commissioner is free to readopt those of his original findings bearing on the amount of recovery which the court did not find it necessary to include in its decision on liability, supra, and which the parties are agreed should be adopted, or which the trial commissioner believes should be adopted as a predicate for his recommendation regarding the amount of recovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came before the court on plaintiff’s motion for rehearing and reconsideration and to amend and alter the court’s opinion and judgment of October 13,1967,181 Ct. Cl. 55, 384 F. 2d 391. Upon consideration thereof, together with [802]*802tbe response thereto and without oral argument, the court on May 10, 1968, ordered that the motion of plaintiff be denied and the case be remanded to the trial commissioner for proceedings under Eule 47 (c); that the trial commissioner is free to readopt those of his original findings bearing on the amount of recovery which the court did not find it necessary to include in its decision on liability, supra, and which the parties are agreed should be adopted, or which the trial commissioner believes should be adopted as a predicate for his recommendation regarding the amount of recovery.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 Ct. Cl. 801, 1968 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1968 WL 2146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/autogiro-co-of-america-cc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack