Auto Finance Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fourth Circuit

Auto Finance Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

229 F.2d 318

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 1956

Docket7123_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 F.2d 318 (Auto Finance Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auto Finance Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 229 F.2d 318 (4th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court holding that the intercorporate transactions there under review, by which the taxpayer corporation disposed of its majority interest in the stock of two corporations to the minority stockholders, resulted in capital gain taxable as such and were not taxable dividends for which taxpayer would have been entitled to credit allowance under 26 U.S.C. § 26(b). The facts are fully and correctly set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court and need not be repeated here. See 24 T.C. -. We think that the decision of the Tax Court was correct for reasons adequately stated in its opinion and that nothing need be added thereto.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court holding that the intercorporate transactions there under review, by which the taxpayer corporation disposed of its majority interest in the stock of two corporations to the minority stockholders, resulted in capital gain taxable as such and were not taxable dividends for which taxpayer would have been entitled to credit allowance under 26 U.S.C. § 26(b). The facts are fully and correctly set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court and need not be repeated here. See 24 T.C. -. We think that the decision of the Tax Court was correct for reasons adequately stated in its opinion and that nothing need be added thereto.

Affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 F.2d 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auto-finance-company-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack