Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills

Ohio Supreme Court

Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills

2001 Ohio 21, 90 Ohio St. 3d 574

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 16, 2001

Docket2000-1543

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 21 (Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills, 2001 Ohio 21, 90 Ohio St. 3d 574 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 574.]

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. MILLS ET AL.; BRANNUM, ADMR., APPELLANT. [Cite as Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills, 2001-Ohio-21.] Insurance—Liability insurance coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Doe v. Shaffer. (No. 00-1543—Submitted December 13, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, Nos. CA99-07-064 and CA99-07-070. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Doe v. Shaffer (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 388, 738 N.E.2d 1243. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs and dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurring and dissenting. {¶ 2} I concur with the decision to reverse on the authority of Doe v. Shaffer (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 388, 738 N.E.2d 1243. However, for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe, supra, I respectfully dissent to the extent that the holding in Doe is being applied retroactively. __________________ Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., Joseph W. Gelwicks and Ralph F. Mitchell, for appellee. Heis & Wenstrup Co., L.P.A., Daniel J. Wenstrup and Rebecca J. Allf, for appellant. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 574.]

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. MILLS ET AL.; BRANNUM, ADMR., APPELLANT. [Cite as Auto. Club Ins. Co. v. Mills, 2001-Ohio-21.] Insurance—Liability insurance coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Doe v. Shaffer. (No. 00-1543—Submitted December 13, 2000—Decided January 17, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, Nos. CA99-07-064 and CA99-07-070. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Doe v. Shaffer (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 388, 738 N.E.2d 1243. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs and dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurring and dissenting. {¶ 2} I concur with the decision to reverse on the authority of Doe v. Shaffer (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 388, 738 N.E.2d 1243. However, for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe, supra, I respectfully dissent to the extent that the holding in Doe is being applied retroactively. __________________ Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., Joseph W. Gelwicks and Ralph F. Mitchell, for appellee. Heis & Wenstrup Co., L.P.A., Daniel J. Wenstrup and Rebecca J. Allf, for appellant. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 21, 90 Ohio St. 3d 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auto-club-ins-co-v-mills-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack