Auto Brokerage Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Auto Brokerage Co. v. Wilson

132 A. 663, 102 N.J.L. 425, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 182

DecidedMarch 26, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A. 663 (Auto Brokerage Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Auto Brokerage Co. v. Wilson, 132 A. 663, 102 N.J.L. 425, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Dungan.

We, however, desire to call attention to the fact that it is not clear to us that the question whether the infant surely was liable on the bond under the rule in La Rosa v. Nichols, 92 N. J. L. 375, was raised in the court below, nor is it clear that the question was raised in this court. In any event, in the view we take of this case, that question does not now call for decision, and we express no opinion with respect thereto.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ, 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Dungan.

We, however, desire to call attention to the fact that it is not clear to us that the question whether the infant surely was liable on the bond under the rule in La Rosa v. Nichols, 92 N. J. L. 375, was raised in the court below, nor is it clear that the question was raised in this court. In any event, in the view we take of this case, that question does not now call for decision, and we express no opinion with respect thereto.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ, 11.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A. 663, 102 N.J.L. 425, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/auto-brokerage-co-v-wilson-nj-1926.