Authenex, Inc. v. EMC Corp.

Federal Circuit

Authenex, Inc. v. EMC Corp.

425 F. App'x 901

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 7, 2011·No. Nos. 2011-1264, 2011-1398·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Authenex, Inc. responds to this court’s order directing it to show cause why its appeal in 2011-1264 should not be dismissed as premature.

Appeal 2011-1264 was filed after the district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement but before the district court entered a final judgment or ruled on pending counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity. Authenex states that the district court recently filed a final judg[902]*902ment resolving all claims in the case and Authenex filed another appeal, 2011-1398, seeking review of the final judgment.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Appeal 2011-1264 is dismissed as premature.

(2) Authenex’s opening brief in 2011-1398 is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Authenex, Inc. responds to this court’s order directing it to show cause why its appeal in 2011-1264 should not be dismissed as premature.

Appeal 2011-1264 was filed after the district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement but before the district court entered a final judgment or ruled on pending counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity. Authenex states that the district court recently filed a final judg[902]*902ment resolving all claims in the case and Authenex filed another appeal, 2011-1398, seeking review of the final judgment.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) Appeal 2011-1264 is dismissed as premature.

(2) Authenex’s opening brief in 2011-1398 is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Authenex, Inc. v. EMC Corp., 425 F. App'x 901 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

425 F. App'x 901 (Authenex, Inc. v. EMC Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.