Auten v. Bryan
Opinion
— The act of Assembly limits the time to Avhich the justice can adjourn, by expressly enacting, that it shall not exceed fifteen days. Pat. 316, § 17. That there was in this case an intermediate adjournment, makes no dif[127]*127íerence; for if the justice can adjourn from time to time, not exceeding fifteen days at a time, the limitation in the act of Assembly, may be defeated altogether. It may be that fifteen days is too short a time, and that a convenience would arise from allowing the justice a greater latitude. If that is so, it is not in our power to help it. We do not sit here to make laws; the judgment must therefore, be reversed.1
Cited in Horner v. Hewlings, 8 Halst. 229.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2 N.J.L. 135 (Auten v. Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.