Auten v. Auten
281 A.D. 740, 117 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 8, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The determination made at Special Term is correct, except that institution of the action for a separation did not bar rights which had accrued under the separation agreement prior to that time. If such rights exist they may be enforced. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed with leave to serve an amended complaint asserting causes of action for payments allegedly payable down to the date of the institution of the separation action. Present — :Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Breitel, JJ. [See 280 App. Div. 912; post, p. 874.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Auten v. Auten, 281 A.D. 740, 117 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
281 A.D. 740 (Auten v. Auten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kulok v. Kulok
40 Misc. 2d 999 (New York District Court, 1963)