Austrian v. Schnapper

23 A.D.2d 840, 259 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116

This text of 23 A.D.2d 840 (Austrian v. Schnapper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austrian v. Schnapper, 23 A.D.2d 840, 259 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Order, entered on July 1, 1964, granting reargument and upon reargument, granting the motion of defendant Schnapper to strike the “ Eighth ” cause of action for legal insufficiency and the motion of defendant Lieberman to strike the Ninth ” cause of action for legal insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements on the authority of Kleinfeld v. Boburn Agencies (270 App. Div. 509). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kleinfeld v. Roburn Agencies, Inc.
270 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 840, 259 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austrian-v-schnapper-nyappdiv-1965.