Austrian v. Schnapper
23 A.D.2d 840, 259 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116
Opinion
Order, entered on July 1, 1964, granting reargument and upon reargument, granting the motion of defendant Schnapper to strike the “ Eighth ” cause of action for legal insufficiency and the motion of defendant Lieberman to strike the “ Ninth ” cause of action for legal insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements on the authority of Kleinfeld v. Boburn Agencies (270 App. Div. 509). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austrian v. Schnapper, 23 A.D.2d 840, 259 N.Y.S.2d 796, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).
23 A.D.2d 840 (Austrian v. Schnapper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kleinfeld v. Roburn Agencies, Inc.
270 A.D. 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)