Austrian v. Central Trust Co.
216 F. 883, 133 C.C.A. 87, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1391
Opinion
This petition to review and revise presents a situation in all material respects exactly the same as that considered in the Case of the Breyer Printing Co. (No. 2084) 216 Fed. 878, herewith decided. For the reasons therein set forth, we are constrained to hold that the matter before the District Court in bankruptcy was a “controversy arising in the course of bankruptcy proceedings,” and not a “proceeding in bankruptcy.”
Tlie petition to review and revise is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austrian v. Central Trust Co., 216 F. 883, 133 C.C.A. 87, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1391 (7th Cir. 1914).
216 F. 883 (Austrian v. Central Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Borland v. Central Trust Co.
216 F. 878 (Seventh Circuit, 1914)