Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co.
121 F. 1017, 56 C.C.A. 678, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4711
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 4, 1903·No. No. 58·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The motion to call mandate and amend instructions to the court below, so as to permit that court to order a rehearing and consider newly discovered evidence, is denied, because it has not been satisfactorily made to appear that the defendant could not have discovered the new evidence, if reasonable diligence had beén exercised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co., 121 F. 1017, 56 C.C.A. 678, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4711 (2d Cir. 1903).
121 F. 1017 (Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Levally
16 F. Supp. 778 (N.D. Illinois, 1936)
Sheeler v. Alexander
211 F. 544 (N.D. Ohio, 1913)