Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co.
121 F. 1017, 56 C.C.A. 678, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4711
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1903
DocketNo. 58
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 121 F. 1017 (Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Australian Knitting Co. v. Wright's Health Underwear Co., 121 F. 1017, 56 C.C.A. 678, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4711 (2d Cir. 1903).
Opinion
The motion to call mandate and amend instructions to the court below, so as to permit that court to order a rehearing and consider newly discovered evidence, is denied, because it has not been satisfactorily made to appear that the defendant could not have discovered the new evidence, if reasonable diligence had beén exercised.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Levally
16 F. Supp. 778 (N.D. Illinois, 1936)
Sheeler v. Alexander
211 F. 544 (N.D. Ohio, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 F. 1017, 56 C.C.A. 678, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/australian-knitting-co-v-wrights-health-underwear-co-ca2-1903.