Austin Wolfe, Inc. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 306
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1962
DocketNo. 66361; protest 58/8141 (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 306 (Austin Wolfe, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin Wolfe, Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 306 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 409, as modified, supra, for bamboo articles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise the subject of C.D. 2098, supra, except that they are made of chip, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 1537 of the act for manufactures of chip, not specially provided for, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walter v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 26 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-wolfe-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1962.