Austin v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 190 Md. 722 (Austin v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 190 Md. 717, 60 A. 2d 179, just decided.
Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence of four-and-one-half years for “housebreaking”—presumably “statutory burglary”, Art. 27, sec. 34. Hickman v. Brady, 188 Md. 103, 52 A. 2d 72. He says he was not guilty but two of his companions were and he was “at the scene”. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 344, 44 A. 2d 807; Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 187 Md. 273, 49 A. 2d 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A. 2d 553.
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 Md. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1947.