Austin v. Walter J. Bryson Paving Co.

200 N.C. 213
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 27, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.C. 213 (Austin v. Walter J. Bryson Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. Walter J. Bryson Paving Co., 200 N.C. 213 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Pee OubiaM.

At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant made a motion in tbe court below for.judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe motion was granted, and in tbis we can see no error.

Tbe evidence excluded, to wbicb exception and assignments of error were made by plaintiff, is not material on tbis record. “From tbe evidence it would seem tbat plaintiff made, and as it were, carried bis own place of work witb bim, and used bis own judgment as to tbe method of doing it.” Merritt v. Foundry Co., 199 N. C., at p. 777; Key v. Chair Co., 199 N. C., 794, and cases cited.

Tbe judgment of tbe court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Key Ex Rel. Key v. Home Chair Co.
156 S.E. 135 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 N.C. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-walter-j-bryson-paving-co-nc-1931.