Austin v. Walter J. Bryson Paving Co.
This text of 200 N.C. 213 (Austin v. Walter J. Bryson Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant made a motion in tbe court below for.judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. Tbe motion was granted, and in tbis we can see no error.
Tbe evidence excluded, to wbicb exception and assignments of error were made by plaintiff, is not material on tbis record. “From tbe evidence it would seem tbat plaintiff made, and as it were, carried bis own place of work witb bim, and used bis own judgment as to tbe method of doing it.” Merritt v. Foundry Co., 199 N. C., at p. 777; Key v. Chair Co., 199 N. C., 794, and cases cited.
Tbe judgment of tbe court below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.C. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-walter-j-bryson-paving-co-nc-1931.