Austin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Austin v. State

1930 OK CR 356, 290 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 236, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 16, 1930·No. No. A-7522.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, one pint of corn whisky and 32 pints of choctaw beer, and his punishment fixed at a fine of f50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail.

The appeal' in this case was filed in this court on the 28th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, one pint of corn whisky and 32 pints of choctaw beer, and his punishment fixed at a fine of f50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail.

The appeal' in this case was filed in this court on the 28th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Austin v. State, 1930 OK CR 356, 290 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 236, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 356 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.