Austin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Austin v. State

1930 OK CR 356, 290 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 236, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 16, 1930

DocketNo. A-7522.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 356 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 1930 OK CR 356, 290 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 236, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, one pint of corn whisky and 32 pints of choctaw beer, and his punishment fixed at a fine of f50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail.

The appeal' in this case was filed in this court on the 28th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, to wit, one pint of corn whisky and 32 pints of choctaw beer, and his punishment fixed at a fine of f50 and confinement for 30 days in the county jail.

The appeal' in this case was filed in this court on the 28th day of August, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 356, 290 P. 1115, 48 Okla. Crim. 236, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.