Austin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Austin v. State

1920 OK CR 59, 194 P. 457, 18 Okla. Crim. 246, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 1, 1920

DocketA-3216

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 59 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 1920 OK CR 59, 194 P. 457, 18 Okla. Crim. 246, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted and the punishment of each assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for one year and - a fine of $500- on an information which in substance charges that in Garfield county, on or about the 22d day of February, 1917, Fred Austin and Joe Austin did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously open, cause to ¡be opened, and conducted and carried on a gambling game, which game was played with cards for money, chips, credits, and other representatives of value. From the judgment *247 rendered on the verdict, an appeal was taken by filing-in this court on December 6, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No (brief has been filed and there has been no appearance on behalf of the defendants on their aippeal.

An examination of the record discloses that no exceptions were taken during the course of the trial. The' testimony of the several witnesses for the state supports the allegations of the information. The testimony of' the defendants and two or three other witnesses tended to support the plea of not guilty. However, the proof on the part of the state seems to have satisfied the jury as to the defendants’ guilt. We find no error affecting the merits of the case.

The judgment of the district court of Garfield county is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted and the punishment of each assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for one year and - a fine of $500- on an information which in substance charges that in Garfield county, on or about the 22d day of February, 1917, Fred Austin and Joe Austin did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously open, cause to ¡be opened, and conducted and carried on a gambling game, which game was played with cards for money, chips, credits, and other representatives of value. From the judgment *247 rendered on the verdict, an appeal was taken by filing-in this court on December 6, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No (brief has been filed and there has been no appearance on behalf of the defendants on their aippeal.

An examination of the record discloses that no exceptions were taken during the course of the trial. The' testimony of the several witnesses for the state supports the allegations of the information. The testimony of' the defendants and two or three other witnesses tended to support the plea of not guilty. However, the proof on the part of the state seems to have satisfied the jury as to the defendants’ guilt. We find no error affecting the merits of the case.

The judgment of the district court of Garfield county is therefore affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 59, 194 P. 457, 18 Okla. Crim. 246, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.