Austin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Austin v. State

113 S.E. 18, 29 Ga. App. 31, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 29

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 25, 1922

Docket13673

StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 18 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 113 S.E. 18, 29 Ga. App. 31, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder and was convicted of shooting at another not in his own defense. The evidence authorized the conviction. There is no merit in the assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court. The charge of the court was adjusted to the evidence and the defendant’s statement. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., ooneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of assault with intent to murder and was convicted of shooting at another not in his own defense. The evidence authorized the conviction. There is no merit in the assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court. The charge of the court was adjusted to the evidence and the defendant’s statement. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., ooneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 S.E. 18, 29 Ga. App. 31, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-gactapp-1922.