Austin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Austin v. State

103 S.E. 716, 25 Ga. App. 401, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 837

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1920

Docket11474

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 716 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 103 S.E. 716, 25 Ga. App. 401, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 837 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. There is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. There was some slight evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the judge and no error of [402]*402law appearing, this court is .without authority to interfere with the discretion of the judge in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided June 15, 1920.

Indictment for larceny after trust; from Bibb superior court — Judge Mathews. March 22, 1920.

H. F. Rawls, W. J. Grace, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI