Austin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Austin v. State

625 So. 2d 1316, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101, 1993 WL 444893

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 3, 1993

DocketNo. 92-0888

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 So. 2d 1316 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 625 So. 2d 1316, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101, 1993 WL 444893 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, except that it is impermissible to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms on a violent habitual felony offender where the offenses arose from the same criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Further, the state concedes error. We reverse this aspect and remand for resentencing to correct the error.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, except that it is impermissible to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms on a violent habitual felony offender where the offenses arose from the same criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Further, the state concedes error. We reverse this aspect and remand for resentencing to correct the error.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

625 So. 2d 1316, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101, 1993 WL 444893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack