Austin v. State
625 So. 2d 1316, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101, 1993 WL 444893
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1993·No. No. 92-0888·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm, except that it is impermissible to impose consecutive mandatory minimum terms on a violent habitual felony offender where the offenses arose from the same criminal episode. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Further, the state concedes error. We reverse this aspect and remand for resentencing to correct the error.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. State, 625 So. 2d 1316, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11101, 1993 WL 444893 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
625 So. 2d 1316 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard v. State
648 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)