Austin v. State
434 So. 2d 350, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20923
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1983·No. No. 83-1510·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief raised one or more grounds which, if true, present a legally sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we remand to the trial court to attach the portion of the record which conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to relief or to conduct an evidentiary hearing in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal [351]*351Procedure 3.850 and Walker v. State, 432 So.2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA) (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. State, 434 So. 2d 350, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
434 So. 2d 350 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fabre v. State
435 So. 2d 939 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)