Austin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Austin v. State

152 So. 919, 26 Ala. App. 617

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 1934

Docket3 Div. 732.

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 919 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Austin v. State, 152 So. 919, 26 Ala. App. 617 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

*618 BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charged that appellant (naming him) with intent to steal broke into and entered the shop or store or warehouse of Graham-Brooks Grocery Company, a corporation, in which goods or merchandise, things of value, were kept for use, sale, or deposit, etc. The trial resulted in his conviction of burglary as charged in the indictment, and judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered. The court, as the law requires, sentenced him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. An appeal was taken to this court. No point of decision is presented other than the regularity of the proceedings in the court below as shown by the record. We find the record regular in all things; hence the judgment of conviction appealed frqm will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*618 BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charged that appellant (naming him) with intent to steal broke into and entered the shop or store or warehouse of Graham-Brooks Grocery Company, a corporation, in which goods or merchandise, things of value, were kept for use, sale, or deposit, etc. The trial resulted in his conviction of burglary as charged in the indictment, and judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered. The court, as the law requires, sentenced him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. An appeal was taken to this court. No point of decision is presented other than the regularity of the proceedings in the court below as shown by the record. We find the record regular in all things; hence the judgment of conviction appealed frqm will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 919, 26 Ala. App. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-alactapp-1934.