Austin v. State

115 So. 921, 22 Ala. App. 656
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1928·No. 7 Div. 393.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We find none upon which this conviction can rest. For the error in refusing to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. State, 115 So. 921, 22 Ala. App. 656 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

115 So. 921 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.