Austin v. Sellers' Administrator.

272 S.W. 16, 208 Ky. 832, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 405
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)·Decided May 12, 1925·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Sandidge

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion rendered on the former appeal declared the judgment that should be entered herein upon the return of the case to the circuit court. As appears from the record upon this appeal, the judgment entered upon the return of the case was in conformity with the former opinion. We are at a loss to understand the purpose of this appeal. The brief filed for appellants appears to deal exclusively with questions presented and determined by the former appeal and fails wholly to point out any particular wherein the judgment entered upon the return of the case is in conflict with the former opinion rendered herein.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. Sellers' Administrator., 272 S.W. 16, 208 Ky. 832, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 405 (Ky. 1925).

272 S.W. 16 (Austin v. Sellers' Administrator.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hutchins v. Emery
183 A. 754 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1936)
Lauth v. Woodruff
251 N.W. 344 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)
Fremd v. Gividen
24 S.W.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)