Austin v. Pober

New York Supreme Court

Austin v. Pober

19 Misc. 2d 558, 196 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2829

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 20, 1959·Published

Opinion

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment is denied.

The plaintiff and defendant were traveling in the same westerly direction, and in a rainstorm. The plaintiff stopped his car abruptly when he discovered he had entered a deep puddle. The defendant’s car, which was following, struck the plaintiff’s in the rear. In the light of the defendant’s claim of an abrupt stop without warning, and the skidding of his car into the plaintiff’s, there is a triable issue of fact. (Zwilling v. Harrison, 269 N. Y. 461; Lahr v. Tirrill, 274 N. Y. 112.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario Pittoni, J.

Motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment is denied.

The plaintiff and defendant were traveling in the same westerly direction, and in a rainstorm. The plaintiff stopped his car abruptly when he discovered he had entered a deep puddle. The defendant’s car, which was following, struck the plaintiff’s in the rear. In the light of the defendant’s claim of an abrupt stop without warning, and the skidding of his car into the plaintiff’s, there is a triable issue of fact. (Zwilling v. Harrison, 269 N. Y. 461; Lahr v. Tirrill, 274 N. Y. 112.)

Motion denied.

Austin v. Pober, 19 Misc. 2d 558, 196 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2829 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

Pincite

19 Misc. 2d 558 (Austin v. Pober) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related