Austin v. Pober
This text of 19 Misc. 2d 558 (Austin v. Pober) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment is denied.
The plaintiff and defendant were traveling in the same westerly direction, and in a rainstorm. The plaintiff stopped his car abruptly when he discovered he had entered a deep puddle. The defendant’s car, which was following, struck the plaintiff’s in the rear. In the light of the defendant’s claim of an abrupt stop without warning, and the skidding of his car into the plaintiff’s, there is a triable issue of fact. (Zwilling v. Harrison, 269 N. Y. 461; Lahr v. Tirrill, 274 N. Y. 112.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Misc. 2d 558, 196 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-pober-nysupct-1959.