Austin v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

869 So. 2d 835, 2004 La. LEXIS 867, 2004 WL 816386
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 19, 2004·No. No. 2003-CC-3412·Published

Opinion

In re Johnson, Jimmy R.; IMEC Inc.;— Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 62,785; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 03-01360.

Granted. Under the unique circumstances of this case, the trial court erred in granting the motion for new trial rather than the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See Morgan v. Be-langer, 617 So.2d 897 (La.1993). Accordingly, the judgment granting the new trial is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court, which is instructed to grant the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to the issue of general damages.

KNOLL, J., would grant and docket. KIMBALL, J., would grant and docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 869 So. 2d 835, 2004 La. LEXIS 867, 2004 WL 816386 (La. 2004).

869 So. 2d 835 (Austin v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. Belanger
617 So. 2d 897 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)