Austin v. Moore
16 La. Ann. 218
Opinion
This case presents simple questions of facts, and we cannot say that the District Judge, who has reviewed the whole evidence with particular care, has erred in his appreciation.
In cases involving questions of facts, and where, usually, the evidence does not fully concord, no damages, as for a frivolous appeal, can be allowed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Moore, 16 La. Ann. 218 (La. 1861).
16 La. Ann. 218 (Austin v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers v. D'AUBIN
498 So. 2d 253 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Anderson v. Louisiana Oil Refg. Corp.
134 So. 343 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)