Austin v. McManamon
This text of 2024 Ohio 5997 (Austin v. McManamon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Austin v. McManamon, 2024-Ohio-5997.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY
HAYLEY AUSTIN, CASE NO. 2024-G-0045
Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas
MICHAEL T. MCMANAMON, et al., Trial Court No. 2024 DC 000380 Defendants,
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK,
Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: December 23, 2024 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Steven L. August, Steven L. August Co., LPA, 3201 Enterprise Parkway, Suite 130, Beachwood, OH 44122 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
Alison M. Huenefeld, Keating Muething & Klekamp, PLL, One East Fourth Street, Suite 1400, Cincinnati, OH 45202 (For Defendant-Appellant).
MATT LYNCH, J.
{¶1} Appellant, American Express National Bank, appeals from an October 16,
2024 judgment entry in which the trial court denied appellant’s motion to set aside the
September 10, 2024 magistrate’s order.
{¶2} A review of the docket reveals that appellee, Hayley Austin, initiated a
complaint for divorce among other claims against Michael T. McManamon and included appellant along with another party as entities having possession, control or an interest in
property from which appellee seeks support. Appellant filed a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to
dismiss and motion for sanctions. On September 10, 2024, the magistrate issued an
order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss. On September 20, 2024, appellant filed a
motion to set aside the magistrate’s order, which was denied by the trial court in an entry
dated October 16, 2024. The instant appeal ensued.
{¶3} We must determine if the entry appealed from is a final appealable order.
According to Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, a judgment of a trial court
can only be immediately reviewed by an appellate court if it constitutes a “final order” in
the action. Estate of Biddlestone, 2011-Ohio-1299, ¶ 3 (11 Dist.). If a lower court’s order
is not final, an appellate court has no jurisdiction to review the matter and the matter must
be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989). For a
judgment to be final and appealable, it must satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and,
if applicable, Civ.R. 54(B).
{¶4} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth seven categories of
appealable judgments, and if the judgment of the trial court satisfies any of them, it will
be deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed.
{¶5} Here, appellant is attempting to appeal from an October 16, 2024 entry
denying a motion to set aside a magistrate’s order. The trial court’s entry does not fit
within any of the categories of R.C. 2505.02 and does not dispose of all the claims. See
DiSanto v. Thomas, 2015-Ohio-4835, at ¶ 4 (11th Dist.). Thus, an appeal from that entry
is premature. Nothing is preventing appellant from obtaining effective relief by way of an
appeal once the trial court has entered a final judgment in the case.
Case No. 2024-G-0045 {¶6} Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of a final
appealable order.
EUGENE A. LUCCI, P.J.,
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2024-G-0045
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 Ohio 5997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-mcmanamon-ohioctapp-2024.