Austin v. Kelly
766 N.W.2d 835
Opinion
Mable C. AUSTIN, Stephanie Austin, Nellie M. Duke, Dolores McElreath, Alfred H. Phillips, Val Jean Phillips, Queta L. Siefker, Atora Todeschini, and Dorothy Todeschini, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Michael Eugene KELLY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Kelly, 766 N.W.2d 835 (Mich. 2009).
766 N.W.2d 835 (Austin v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.