Austin v. Haley
This text of 212 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (Austin v. Haley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Counsel for defendant Michael Haley having indicated during a conference on July 24, 2002, that, in light of Hope v. Pelzer, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002), the Alabama Department of Corrections does not intend to resume use of the hitching post or restraining bar, it is ORDERED that any additional relief in this litigation is unnecessary and thus is denied. Austin v. Hopper, 15 F.Supp.2d 1210, 1272-1274 (M.D.Ala.1998) (discussing what additional relief, if any, might be appropriate).
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs are allowed until August 7, 2002, to file any request for attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14050, 2002 WL 1769938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-haley-almd-2002.