Austin v. Gage
9 Mass. 395
Opinion
said that lands descended in another state cannot be considered as assets in this state. Of consequence, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover against the defendants, and he must therefore be called,
Plaintiff nonsuit.
[Doolittle vs. Lewis, 7 Johns. Ch. Rep. 5. — Morrill vs. Dilkey, 1 Johns. Ch. Rev 153.— Williams vs. Storrs, 6 Johns. Ch. Rep. 353. — Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Gage, 9 Mass. 395 (Mass. 1812).
9 Mass. 395 (Austin v. Gage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beardsley v. Hall
291 Mass. 411 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Julian v. Boston, Clinton, Fitchburg & New Bedford Railroad
128 Mass. 555 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Kohler v. Knapp
1 Bradf. 241 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1850)
Jennison v. Hapgood
27 Mass. 77 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1830)
Hooker v. Olmstead
23 Mass. 481 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1828)